93
In
2. Its the Grand Jury of
Hong Kong
doubt has arisen as to the meaning of
a sentence in the 9th paragraph of my despatch
of the 28th ult.
It was stated that the practice following the last
unpage 3, paragraph 33, Chief Police's Report
I enclose in M. Monk's
letter of the 28th February
Occlus Jing Underin 25
"Judge's charge
906
as
V
5
Clerk of the Summary Court,
setting fire to the Registry
"I who will be able
"under the attention of
the Office
4
seems. If it appears that it
was not at the Summary Court at the
time.
3. We interpret this part as opposed
to page 4, Chief Police's Report
is quite satisfactory, in that
the Images that occurred, took place at the Registry
93
In
2. Its te prand Genaqush of
panaquaple
Jour der pratch for enfren
that
Ame
à doubt has arisen
in to the meaning of
Sentence
in cha
за
9
paragraph of my despart
of the 28th 1 Jamaz:
was
founded
that pentice following te patraci last
unpage 3
papan Jage 33
Cheif Portice's Repert
I to protect
Enclered in M. Monk's
کھنا
Jos de palit the of to
28th Gelbro
Occles Jing Underin
25
"Judge's chall
906
as
V
5
cleak of to Summary Court,
setting fire to depeg Registran
Деред
"I who wil be alle
فسهم
"underrelld attention G
6 Office wak
4
seemed. If pean that it
Defect Repetien
Expected
§ attend
was not
Summary comt at cz
the
L
d
time.
3. We inter partition part eppone
hato
to palpage 4,ats Chiffusée
is quite pelisfarlig man that
the Inages chat phoned of lake to place of the depres
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.